How new ventures can gain competitive advantage in the international scene
https://ilokabenneth.blogspot.com/2013/12/how-new-ventures-can-gain-competitive.html
Author: Iloka Benneth Chiemelie
Published: 08/12/2013
1.0 Explain how the article builds on the seminal work of Oviatt and McDougall in their paper, Toward a Theory of International New Ventures, published in 1994
The highlight which serves as the
foundation of the article is based on the understanding that the publication of
“Towards a theory of international new ventures” (Oviatt
and McDougall, 1994) in the past decade has been the centre of
attraction in terms of the attention towards the increase in role played by
young firms in the modern world marketplace.
The argument presented by Oviatt and McDougall (1994) is that international new
ventures have been in existence for numerous years but the researches on such
have been limited as researchers seem to overlook them. The authors continued
to present a discussion of how these features influences the competitiveness of
international new ventures in the global marketplace. Their argument continued
with the notion that current theories are not designed to understand how the
INVs are formed, and as such the authors challenged as well as revised a number
of exiting and powerful conceptions on the internationalization process with
special reference to the stage theory (Johanson and
Vahlne, 1977).
This is the background from which Zahra (2005) developed a new article ‘A theory of
international new ventures: A decade of research’ with the objective to present
a review of the body of researches on the field, distilling and clarifying the
contributions that were made by the original paper by Oviatt
and McDougall (1994).
2.0
Describe and analyse the factors identified in the Zahra article as giving
competitive advantage to new firms in the globalised economy
Zahra (2005) centred the discussion
of factors that influences competitive advantage for new firms in globalized
economy on the benefits of “learning concepts” and the suggestions made by Dimitratos and Plakoyiannaki (2003) on the embodiment
of international entrepreneurship culture. These factors include:
2.1
Market orientation
– it implies that the firm should have interest and be committed to the
activities in international market as it related to their presence in these
markets and business operations.
2.2
Learning orientation
– this implies that the firm should gather, interpret and disseminate
intelligence as it relates to the foreign market they operate in and be well
alerted on opportunities that might usher into the market.
2.3
Innovation propensity
– the reference laid down in this case is that the firm should be willing and
able to invest in pursue of new ideas.
2.4
Risk attitude
– the emphasis laid in this case is that the firm must be willing to undertaken
and address significant level of risky resources and commitment in order to
obtain new opportunities in the foreign market.
2.5
Networking orientation
– the firm should be able to operate in the form of alliances, cooperative
ventures and other formal as well as informal networking approaches in order to
obtain necessary resources for international business.
2.6
Motivation orientation
– this implies that the firm should keep employees motivated by adopting
incentives and rewards and also offer promotional opportunities for the
workforce as such will help them to be able to explore and exploit
opportunities in the foreign market.
3.0
Do you agree that these are the key factors underlying success in the
international business environment?
Yes! Definitely
3.1
Give reasons for your answer
The reasons are:
3.1.1
Market orientation
– understanding the market will help them understand their competitors and
customers, and as such improve their competitive advantage through the adoption
of right strategies.
3.1.2
Learning orientation
– this is still similar with the market orientation, it will help them to learn
from past failures and avoid it in the future or improve based on past and
proven successes factors.
3.1.3
Innovation propensity
– innovation makes firms competitive as it adds more features to the products/services,
which will mean an increase in customers’ satisfaction.
3.1.4
Risk attitude
– some business opportunities can be risky and as such deter other competitors.
In that case, if the company is able to attain success in these areas they will
improve their competitiveness.
3.1.5
Networking orientation
– partnering with other companies (especially those from the foreign county
where the company is operating) will help advance their understanding of the
market and as such help improve their business success.
3.1.6
Motivation orientation
– without the workforce the company is destined to fail, but motivated
workforce will mean improved productivity and profitability and as such improve
competitive advantage.
REFERENCES
Oviatt, B.M. & McDougall, P.P.
(1994) ‘Toward a theory of international new ventures’, Journal of
International Business Studies, 25 (1), pp. 45–64.
Zahra, S.A. (2005) ‘A theory of international new
ventures: A decade of research’, Journal of International Business Studies, 36
(1), January, pp. 20–28.
Dimitratos, P. and Plakoyiannaki, E. (2003)
'Theoretical foundations of an international entrepreneurial culture', Journal
of International Entrepreneurshi1p( 2): 187-215.
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. (1977) 'The
internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing
foreign market commitments', Journal of International Business Studies 8(1):
23-32.