assigning overhead in ABC costing method
https://ilokabenneth.blogspot.com/2014/02/assigning-overhead-in-abc-costing-method.html
Phone
|
Tablet
|
Computer
|
Total
|
|||
Material cost per unit
|
90
|
140
|
315
|
|||
Direct labor hours per
unit
|
2
|
2.5
|
4
|
|||
Budgeted units
|
1,500,000
|
900,000
|
1,200,000
|
|||
DLHs
|
3,000,000
|
2,250,000
|
4,800,000
|
10,050,000
|
||
£7.96
|
< --- Overhead rate for DLHs
|
|||||
Labor cost per hour
|
8
|
|||||
Overhead
costs per annum
|
||||||
Utilities
|
£20,000,000.00
|
|||||
Rent
|
£15,000,000.00
|
|||||
Audit and legal
|
£5,000,000.00
|
|||||
Administrative staff
|
£40,000,000.00
|
|||||
Total
|
£80,000,000.00
|
|||||
Overheads
|
Phone
|
Tablet
|
Computer
|
Total
|
||
Utilities
|
£8,000,000
|
£5,000,000
|
£7,000,000
|
£20,000,000
|
||
Rent
|
£8,250,000
|
£2,250,000
|
£4,500,000
|
£15,000,000
|
||
Audit and legal
|
£2,900,000
|
£1,250,000
|
£850,000
|
£5,000,000
|
||
Administrative staff
|
£23,200,000
|
£6,000,000
|
£10,800,000
|
£40,000,000
|
||
£42,350,000
|
£14,500,000
|
£23,150,000
|
£80,000,000
|
|||
Question
1:
|
Phone
|
Tablet
|
Computer
|
|||
Full costing sales
price
|
£170.69
|
£233.87
|
£435.67
|
|||
Material cost
|
£90.00
|
£140.00
|
£315.00
|
|||
Direct Labor cost
|
£16.00
|
£20.00
|
£32.00
|
|||
Overhead based on DLHs
|
£15.92
|
£19.90
|
£31.84
|
|||
Profit
|
£48.77
|
£53.97
|
£56.83
|
|||
profit percentage
|
28.57%
|
23.08%
|
13.04%
|
|||
Question 2
Full costing sales
price
|
£187.93
|
£228.94
|
£421.24
|
|||
Material cost
|
£90.00
|
£140.00
|
£315.00
|
|||
Direct Labor cost
|
£16.00
|
£20.00
|
£32.00
|
|||
Overhead based on ABC
|
£28.23
|
£16.11
|
£19.29
|
|||
Profit
|
£53.69
|
£52.83
|
£54.95
|
|||
profit percentage
|
28.57%
|
23.08%
|
13.04%
|
Question 3
From the single cost driver (traditional) method adopted in
the analysis above, it can be seen that the overhead is actually assigned to
products based on the direct labour hour that has been utilized, thus spreading
more overhead to computers as a result of their higher labour usage. In any
case, it can also be seen from the table down the left that phones actually
make use of and incur more overheads than computers in the process. By adopting
ABC as the accounting method for allocating overhead based on the actual
resources that has been consumed in the process of delivery, the phones will
then be absorbing a greater deal of overhead the more. Thus, it is recommended
that the company should make use of ABC as the accounting method in order for
the product to absorb the actual overhead of the resources they have incurred
in the course of production. This is the best decision in terms of viewing it
form the change it will inflict on profit with change in the production of the
products.
It is also important to note that the suggested pricing
strategy of adding a certain perfect for each product line will actually work
so long as the price that has been derived is in line with the range that the
market offers for such products under the conditions of increased competition
and substitute products. In any case, it should also be noted that the decision
to allocate overhead under the standards of ABC has considerably raised the
phone prices, which means that it might not be so much possible to retain the
same price level if a cost-plus-profit pricing policy is adopted. Additionally,
if the computers were performing well under the previous prices, the company
might desire to maintain such prices and enjoy and even greater percentage of
profit from that product as a compensation for the potentialities that might
arise from the need to reduce the overall profit level on phones.