Internationalizing Flight Center Limited into China: A cultural review
https://ilokabenneth.blogspot.com/2014/02/internationalizing-flight-center.html
Author: Iloka Benneth Chiemelie
Published: 20th February 2014
Products
and services offered by Flight Center Limited
Flight center limited
continued its evolution in the 2012/23 with new strategic blueprints that have
been developed and implemented by the company as a guide towards its move to
next phase of business growth (Flight Center Limited, 2013). Although the main
seven strategic focus point of the company are still in place, there have been
developments of new blueprint that the company believes will resonate with its
staffs and customers. Basically, the focus is on making use of the staffs for
increased productivity with the aim of serving the customers much better.
Basically, the services
offered by flight center are leisure packages such as flight booking, hotel
booking and reservations. As a world class retailer, the implication is that
flight center is the business brand that people always find easy to identify
with and go to for related services (Flight Center Limited, 2013). The
functions performed by flight center limited is much different from that
performed by middlemen, agents, dealers or someone who sales products of other
people. The brand offers numerous services are described below.
Brands and specialization
The process of evaluating
the brand is based on ideology that is evaluations for specific areas of travel
and having clear customers value propositions (CVPs). Such level of
specialization and service offerings as provided by flight center is based on
the three concepts as:
Inbuilt brand planning system – the company has a regimented structure that is used
for the purpose of implementing its brand process in order to ensure that the
key questions are addressed by the company as necessary for the purpose of
maintaining its established brand values (Flight Center Limited, 2013).
Global brand taskforce – the company also has a senor leadership team that
is designed for the purpose of undertaking FLT’s global brand value management.
These teams are responsible for the task of designing, deploying, and disciplining
brand structure (Flight Center Limited, 2013).
Flight center 7
– for the purpose of remaining very competitive in the market where competition
is high such as the travel and hospitality industry, the brand adopts a very
unique seven key CVPs which has been identified and articulated for the
company’s flagship leisure brands (Flight Center Limited, 2013).
2.
A
description of the organisational context
The success of flight center
limited is based on a number of factors and strategies adopted by the company
for the purpose of increasing its overall market value, performance and
profitability in the market in which it operates. The company made known that
in order to ensure sustainability for the next 100 years and beyond, it must
have a clearly defined and achievable corporate vision, purpose and
philosophies (Flight Center Limited, 2013). The company also vows to protect
its future by developing its own corporate strategy and philosophies, which
must be robust, independent, and with the ability to outline its current and
future leaders (Flight Center Limited, 2013).
Corporate visions
The visions which serve as
the company’s desire to growth is “to the most exciting travel company in the
world, delivering an amazing experience to its staffs, customers and business
partners.”
Corporate philosophies
There are different
philosophies developed by the company to serve as the bases of their business
performance. The first of such is high focus on the training and development of
employees’ skills as the company understand and visualize the employees to be
the source of their continued growth, which means that staffs must always be
trained on new and needed skills in the course of meeting their corporate
objectives.
Customers also serve as the
ground of the company’s philosophies, as it seek to ensure that customers are
always given needed services in the level of quality they desire to have them.
For instance, the company develops all of its business offerings based on
researches conducted with customers to understand their needs and develop their
services based on such needs. The purpose of such is to ensure sustainability
in the business process as such will increase chances of customers ordering
their services and the overall profitability with an increase in the ordering
process. All these features are aligned with a strategic management approach
that is based on adopting reliable leadership network that will increases
chances for success in both national and international level.
The overall performance of
the company can be reflected on the chairman’s message in its 2013 operations
release, where the chairman made known that it is pleasing to report that the
company has been able to render its growth record during the course of 2013 as
ended in June 30, 2013.
Following the success of its
business, the company has been able to record growth in different areas with
the Total Transaction Value (TTV) rounding up in the excess of $14 billion, and
the chairman also made known that Flight Center Limited will be able to reach
the $15 billion landmark is the brand is able to achieve its set objectives
within the course of the year. Profit prior to tax (PBT) accounted for $300
million, and this is significant following the recorded $200 million in the
past two years and also finishing just behind the target of $350 million
(Flight Center Limited, 2013).
Although these results
server as highlight of the company’s strength, it is important to understand
that there are other factors which are integral for the success of Flight
center limited – and this factors are its people’s appetite for increased and
sustainable growth throughout the year, and the desire to develop robust
businesses that are capable of ensuring sustainable earnings (Flight Center
Limited, 2013). Following the documented success, the company has now been able
to deliver year-on-year increase for its PBT for its 18 years operation as a
publicly listed company (Flight Center Limited, 2013). In fact, a review of the
shared price growth shows that the company is actually the fifth-best
performing top 200 stock during the course of the 2012/13 year in review.
The company is also
deploying new customer features wherever possible, and it plans to open a new
UK-style of hypertores in major cities and regions across the world. Basically,
the success of the brand is based mainly on adopting a number of expansion and
internationalization strategies designed to enter new markets and serve new
customers. Thus, the growth strategy by the company can be described as
sustainable in the sense that it has been integrated into the core elements of
the company’s daily business process as to what they expect to obtain by the
end of the year and how they will go about meeting such expectations.
3.
Cultural Comparison of Russia (host country) and
England (home country)
The need to understand the
market that any given business is designed to perform in is very significant
because it will help to expand the understanding on what the company needs to
do, how it will go about doing that, as well as challenges that the company
might face and how it can be solved. The apology for such analysis based on
this paper will be that created by Hofstede (1980) will
be adopted for this comparison. This framework comprises of 5 components for
measuring national culture as power distance, individualism,
masculinity/femininity, uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation.
Figure (1): comparison of
the English and Russian cultures
Source as adopted from: Geert-hofstede.com (2012)
3.1. Power distance: power distance as noted in the degree to which people accept that they
are not equal with others and are willing to accept as well as respect the
commands of those they feel inferior to. In terms of the management aspect, the
implication in countries with high power distance such as China is that
managers and supervisors have the final say in the organization and their
subordinates are only left with the idea of having to deal with whatever their
seniors have said and however such commands have been laid down. On the other
hand, UK has a different culture in which employees work together with the
management in the course of any decision making process. As such, the
management are not view with high fear as is applicable in from their Chinese
counterparts, instead the management work together with the employees for the
course of developing the business and aligning their overall corporate
performance together (Geert-hofstede.com, 2012).
3.2. Individualism-vs-communism: individualism is viewed as the degree to which to
which people wish to be left alone or are willing to work together with other
people. In a country with high level of individualism such as the UK, the
citizens are normally independent of other people in the course of their
decision or livelihood. They want to free and do whatever they want whenever
they do desires, thus decision making is very fast and risky in the business
process as these individuals are willing to be held responsible for mistakes
and also be appreciated for any positive impact made in the business process (Geert-hofstede.com, 2012). This is different in China
where communism is very high and people do prefer to work as a group. Thus,
establishing business in China will mean that the company will adopt more of
team working than individual effort in order to ensure that it meets the
cultural settings and expectations in China.
3.3. Masculinity / femininity: in the business context, masculine culture is characterized
with competition and the need for continued growth, which means that companies
must always seek their own individual gain (prudence), even if it means putting
that of their competitors at risk (Geert-hofstede.com,
2012). This is different in a feminine country because the focus is on
creating ground for mutual benefit of all parties as this culture emphasized on
nurturing and creating harmony among people (Geert-hofstede.com,
2012). Both China and the UK have the same level of masculinity, which
means that they both value continued business growth at all cost and it is
unique in the sense that it doesn’t call for any change in this area.
3.4. Uncertainty avoidance – this is the degree to which people from a given
culture are willing to take business related risk, with he understand that the
higher the business risk, the higher the expected returns. Thus, a country with
high level of uncertainty avoidance doesn’t want to take much risk but instead
prefer to always have all possible issues identified and solutions provided
before going into any business decision (Geert-hofstede.com,
2012). Both the UK and China are low in uncertainty avoidance and this
implies that they both take high business risk for the purpose of meeting their
set corporate goals and this is reflected in the understanding that they are
highly masculine countries.
3.5. Long-term orientation – this is normally used as a reflection and definition
for the Chinese guanxi or Confucian system, in which people view business
process as being more of a partnership and relationship than just the course of
going through transaction based features. In this system of business, the focus
is on developing long-term friendship with the believe that it will increase
trust and make the business transaction more sustainable (Geert-hofstede.com, 2012). China is high on long-term
orientation, thus unlike UK which is low on such features, the Chinese business
can transact on credit, creating the need for the companies involved to develop
higher trust. Additionally, government issue contracts more to the people that
are more closely related to the government and those who have delivered in the
past even when government couldn’t afford one-time payment. Thus, this high
level of difference as to business being viewed as transactional or
relationship based is something that Flight Center UK needs to understand in
order to ensure success in the Chinese business segment.
4.
An analysis of how the product/service fits with the environment of the host
country
Tourism and hospitality
services are commonly sourced for both in the Chinese setting and across the
world because tourism agencies eliminate all the pressures that customers are
normally forced to handle in the course of obtaining such services. Additionally,
agencies are in the right position to provided needed guidance as to the
destination that is best for the customers and the cheapest services that
customers can obtain. Additionally, China as a country has huge population and
numerous destinations that are interesting to customers. Thus, offering an
agency service in China is expected to have a subsequent high rate of success
because the huge population provides needed market base, while numerous
destinations available in China increases chances of the market to order
services provided by the company. Thus, investing in China is a very viable
option.
5. Entry strategy: critical risks involved and plan to
mitigate risks
The entry strategy adopted
in this case is franchising and the understanding is that flight center should
franchise its brand to China. Franchising has been found to play significant
role in terms of the modern business. Franchising as a form of business
entrepreneurship is currently increasing in adoption in different sectors,
especially with reference to the retailing system where McDonald’s has been
able to establish itself across the world by adopting franchising as its
business setting. In accordance with the Deontological
European Code of Honour (2004), franchising is a system used for the
purpose of selling commodities, services and/or other technological
applications. The process is based on close and continuous cooperation two
different companies that are judiciary independent and financially autonomous,
which comprises of the franchisee and franchisor. In this form of business, it
is the franchisor grants franchisee necessary right that puts the franchisee
under the obligation that will allow then to exploit a business in accordance
with the business concepts already established by the franchisor. As a reward
in return to such an opportunity, the franchisee pays a certain and agreed
franchising fee to the franchisor on royalties throughout the course of the
business partnership. Additionally, the franchisor in return to these payments
grants the franchisee the right to make use of or adopt their brand name,
trademarks, expertise, commercial and technical methods, operational procedures
and other intellectual properties that will allow the franchisee to run the
business as it is run by the franchisor.
The main reason for choosing
this form of entry strategy is because UK and China have numerous differences
in terms of their cultural value and overall approaches to business. For
instance, while the UK tend to be more transactional based, China is more
relationship based and it can influence their overall approach in designing
corporate goals, evaluating performance and defining what is to be done and how
it should be done. Thus, entering into China via a company that is already
established in the country and familiar with the settings in terms of cultural
values and business principles of the country can be considered a viable
option. Additionally, it eliminates the need to indulge in huge financial
expenses that might end up not returning expected value and lead to huge
financial losses in the end. Thus, this approach is chosen based on the
understanding that it will eliminate a number of business risks that can
influence the overall performance of flight center UK in the Chinese business
environment.
While the above strategy is
expected to return high values in terms of overall perception and penetration
of the brand into China through an already established brand in the country, a
number of literatures (see Bradach, 1997;
Srinivasan, 2006; Shane, 1996a, b). Some of these issues are:
5.1. Damage to brand image as a result of franchisee’s
mistake – since the franchisor is
issued the license to operate the new business under it’s own settings and
definitions, it is important tat this increases the chances of direct attacks
on the brand as a result of the settings defined by the franchisor’s own
business. For instance, the company might adopts strategies viewed by the market
to be discriminating or sensitive, then the market might start to perceive the
brand as racial or immoral, and it will negatively influence the perception of
flight center in the process.
5.2. Earnings are much lower – while this entry strategy is very easy to adopt, it
is important to understand that the expected and actual earnings from the
process are very much lower than when adopting FDI as an entry strategy. Thus,
the company might need to look into the long-term performance and earnings when
compared with what is obtainable from other entry strategies and determine
whether or not it is the right business approach to adopt in the end of such
comparative analysis.
5.3. Poor management and secrecy – since the performance of the brand generally
influences the actual outcome of how much they need to incur in royalties, it
is important to understand that poor performance of managements will
effectively lead to under-performance of the brand in China because the
franchisee will not be able to pay the franchisor higher royalties as hoped
for. Additionally, some of the franchisee might be very secretive and unwilling
to disclose their market studies with the franchisor. Even when forced to do
such, they might be doing it selectively and this reduces the chances for the
franchisor to understand the market they operate in, and expand their overall
experience and knowledge about the market.
From the above analysis, a
number of issues have been defined as to the factors that will negatively
influence the franchise business, making it important for the franchisor to
define new ways and approaches that will be used to eliminate these issues for
the sole purpose of ensuring sustainability in the positive performance of the
business. Thus, the right approach is to adopt a contract based franchising
system that ignores the need for Confucianism as is obtainable in China and
forces the franchisee to agree to specific terms on how the business will be
run in China. This will ensure that the franchisor includes numerous clauses
that will eliminate issues of brand asset management as well as payment of
royalties, thus providing them with much needed control and direct management
of the business in China even if it is just a franchise network.
6. Conclusion
From the above analysis, the
highlight has ben on understanding how cultural differences influences the
business process within a given area as compared with another area and this
paper has been successful in laying down such view. This is because differences
in culture imply differences in the way that businesses are conducted in a
given area as opposed to the process it is also conducted in another area. This
is why transaction to get more profits now is the order of the day in the UK
where long-term orientation is on the high, while friendship and credit sales
for a sustainable business tomorrow is the order to the day in China where
long-term orientation is on the high. The implication of adopting franchising
as the entry strategy has also been defined in the process and necessary
solutions have been provided to support such a strategy in order to ensure that
it works out very successful for the brands involved.
7. References
Deontologische Europese
Erecode versie 2004 (2008). http://www.fbfbff.be/files/code/CODEDEDEONTOLOGIENL.pdf
Flight Center UK (2013),
“Annual report.” Available at: http://admin.flightcentrelimited.com/sites/flightcentrelimited.com/files/1.%20FLT%202013%20Annual%20Report_0.pdf
Gert-hofstede.com (20130,
“Comparison of China and the UK.” Available at: http://geert-hofstede.com/united-kingdom.html
Shane, S. A., 1996a, Hybrid
Organizational Arrangements and Their Implications for Firm Growth and
Survival, Academy of Management Journal 39, 216 – 234.
Shane, S. A., 1996b, Why
Franchise Companies Expand Overseas, Journal of Business Venturing 11, 73 – 88.
Srinivasan, R., 2006, Dual
Distribution and Intangible Firm Value: Franchising in Restaurant Chains, Journal of Marketing 70,
120 – 135.