Factors that influence adoption of online transaction in Malaysia
https://ilokabenneth.blogspot.com/2014/12/factors-influencing-adoption-on-online.html
Author: Iloka Benneth Chiemelie
Published: 15th-December-2014
Abstract
In the wake of the increased adoption of information n communication technologies, businesses have drawn new lines on how to undertake their operations in order to ensure effective deliver and increased profitability. This is because information and communication technologies have ushered in a new era of convenience and security. For instance, consumers in the banking sector don’t need to queue up in long lines anymore as they can convenient performing their banking transactions via ATM, online or phone. However, there are indications that while communication and information technologies are on the rise, some consumers are reluctant to adopt such technologies due to a number of reasons. Some of the most referenced reasons include security issues, privacy issues, and ease of use. On the ground of such understanding, this research is developed to understand factors that influence consumer’s decision to adopt e-banking services in Malaysia. Following extensive primary and secondary research, the reasons became clear in view and when Malaysia is referenced as is the case of this research, the factors influence: security, privacy, risk, and trust. Malaysian consumers will likely adopt e-banking services if they trust the facilities offered by the bank; an associate such transaction with lower risk, higher security, and higher privacy.
Published: 15th-December-2014
Abstract
In the wake of the increased adoption of information n communication technologies, businesses have drawn new lines on how to undertake their operations in order to ensure effective deliver and increased profitability. This is because information and communication technologies have ushered in a new era of convenience and security. For instance, consumers in the banking sector don’t need to queue up in long lines anymore as they can convenient performing their banking transactions via ATM, online or phone. However, there are indications that while communication and information technologies are on the rise, some consumers are reluctant to adopt such technologies due to a number of reasons. Some of the most referenced reasons include security issues, privacy issues, and ease of use. On the ground of such understanding, this research is developed to understand factors that influence consumer’s decision to adopt e-banking services in Malaysia. Following extensive primary and secondary research, the reasons became clear in view and when Malaysia is referenced as is the case of this research, the factors influence: security, privacy, risk, and trust. Malaysian consumers will likely adopt e-banking services if they trust the facilities offered by the bank; an associate such transaction with lower risk, higher security, and higher privacy.
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1.
Background
In the business setting as
well as in the world of research and academics, a number of questions has been
raised as to what influences consumers’ to buy. The main factor guiding such
intention is to understand ways that brands can actually increase sales by
increasing consumers’ purchase intention. While the question has not been so
easy in the conventional world, the recent increase in development, adoption
and penetration of information and communication technologies has further
expanded the question in the area of e-commerce.
Yulihasri et al.
(2011)
conducted a research to understand the factors that influences consumers’
adoption of internet technology with focus the Malaysia market. The researchers
further expanded the understanding by laying down detailed discussion on the
present increase in internet adoption as it influences e-commerce – thus
calling on brands to be more responsive towards providing customers with online
sales. Still on their discussion, the main element present in their research
with respect to why consumers’ prefer online shopping and transaction is
because of the convenience and ease of use that it does come with. This can be
further expanded with the factual understanding that unlike the conventional
shopping world that can be limited by time, location, or brands, the online
shopping world is actually unlimited as consumers can shop 24/7 at any given
point and any given place in time so long as they have access to the internet.
In a different but related research
with more focus on the factors that influences consumers’ adoption of internet
banking; Syed et al (2009) present their own
view with respect to the same Malaysian market. The main emphasizes from their research
is that the increase in internet adoption within the corporate level helps
companies to reduce their overall operation cost by influencing decrease in
employees demand as well as resources. Customization also means that companies
can now afford to charge higher than they used to because they would take the
influence of tailoring services and products to create costs that did not
previously exist (Parisa, 2006).
While a number of studies
have highlighted the benefits of online transaction for both customers and
consumers’, there are also studies reflecting on the potential risk of such to
both parties. For instance, the research by Pang
(1995) identified a number of issues related to e-commerce and online
transaction with respect to both the company and the individual. For the
individual, the research made known that the increasing adoption of online
shopping has subsequently increase risks such as hacking and unauthorized
permission into personal information and causing subsequent losses to the
customers (Pang, 1995). On the side of the
company, it is much worst because unauthorized access to the company’s
information can lead to millions of losses for the bank and customers (Pang, 1995). There are renowned cases already
documented across the world such as the case of Samsung’s hacking, in which
hackers bypassed the system’s security and defrauded customers millions of
dollars. Thus, the decision to adopt online banking is very difficult for the
consumers as a result of the numerous risks that can be associated with such
operations, which can deter these users from making use of the online
transactions.
1.2.
Problem statement
As discussed above, Pang
(1995) has identified a number of problems related to online transaction with
respect to influence on both consumers and companies. Online transaction has
without much doubt increased risk in commerce and business process especially
when considering the fact that victimizers can come from any part of the world,
which reduces the chances of identifying them. Thus, the main problem with
online transaction when reflecting directly on consumers is that it exposes
them to lose of information and financial fraud as well as other damages such as
impersonation and damages to personal image. It can also lead to unauthorized
access to and loss of important personal documents in the process. All these
issues lead to reduced intention from the consumers to adopt online
transactions and a subsequent reduction on sales for companies (Pang, 1995)
Thus, this is the main problem this research is designed to solve in order to
define new approaches that will help in advancing consumers’ overall experience
and security.
1.3.
Importance of research
In the present business setting, understanding why consumers purchase is
very important to producers because it helps to design products and services
aligned with such influence and ensure that sales is more or less guaranteed.
Consumer behavior has been very important since the inception of consumers’
purchase and decision making process, with numerous studies already aligned in
that field. Additionally, meeting the needs of consumers is the easiest way to
guarantee success as it will increase consumers’ level of satisfaction,
increase repurchase intention, increase recommendations of the brand for other
consumers, and thus increase sustainability in sales for the brands (Chan, 2001; Johnson et al., 1995; Jeon and Rice, 1997;
Baldock, 1997).
In any case, the present research has called
to mind the fact that while it is important for brands to understand the needs
of consumers and tailor their services towards meeting such needs, not all of
such approaches has been successful as complications can exist with respect to
needs when comparing people from different locations, cultures and with different
lifestyles (Chan, 2001). Additionally, increasing level of e-commerce adoption
in the world has also increased associated risks for both consumers and
companies (Pang, 1995). This is because hackers have devised numerous ways of
gaining access to personal information and misusing them. On that accord, it
can easily be understood that consumers will be very reluctant to adopt online
transaction when they are aware of these security issues, and in cases where
they even decide to make such adoptions, they will be precautious (Pang, 1995).
Thus, the importance of this research is
reflected on the fact that it is designed to understanding and analyzes the
factors that influence consumers’ decision to purchase online. In the process
of meeting such objectives, the research will also analyze existing theories in
the area of study as well as help in enhancing these theories with findings
that will be made from the study. This study is considered important because it
will help managers to understand the main reasons why consumers shop online,
and how these consumers go about such process, thus creating the right
framework for an enhanced customer service. Additionally, it will also help to
understand consumers’ fears when it comes to shopping online, and devise way that
these issues can be resolved to ensure higher experience rate for consumers
online.
1.3. Research
purpose
The purpose of this research
is already defined in the research title: understanding factors that influence
consumers’ purchase decision online in reference to Malaysian consumers.” Thus,
the research is built on how such factors that be enhanced or mitigated by
determining what factors influences consumers decision making process and how
such influence is shaped. In the view of that, the research s built on the
following objectives as presented below.
1.3.1. Research objectives
The objectives of this
research are:
- To understanding the
factors that influences Malaysian consumers’ online purchase
- To understand how these
factors are shaped and build towards such influential role
- To understand the kind
of influence that these factors have with respect to online purchase
- To understand how the
influence can be mitigated or enhanced for the purpose of increasing
consumers’ confidence in online purchase and overall sales for companies
in that section.
1.3.2. Research questions
In order to achieve the set
objectives, these questions shape the whole research process and define what is
to be done and how it will be done.
- What are the factors
that influences Malaysian consumers’ online purchase?
- How are these factors
shaped and build towards such influential role?
- What are the kinds of
influence that these factors have with respect to online purchase?
- How can the influence
be mitigated or enhanced for the purpose of increasing consumers’
confidence in online purchase and overall sales for companies in that
section?
1.4. Limitations of
research scope
In the view of the above
discussions and overall definitions of the research purpose, process and
approaches, a number of limitations can be defined with respect to the research
scope. In any case, it is important to start with redefining the scope of the
research, and the scope is centered on understanding factors that influence
Malaysian consumers’ adoption of online transactions. It should also be noted
that online transaction in this case reflects any form of transaction conducted
electronically such as online shopping, online banking, POS and other
e-Commerce based transactions. Thus, while the scope is very direct towards
“influential factors on online transactions,” the area covered is very wide;
making application of findings less direct as there is no clear definition of a
particular area of reference group when it comes to applying the findings.
This limitation can further
be expanded in its view by stating that the finding can be applied in any of
the forms of online transaction (banking, shopping, booking flights, hotel
reservations, games, stock trading etc.) which makes it very limiting as there
is no guarantee that a given finding can be applied to all of these areas.
Thus, the scope of the research can be defined as being limited in
applicability. The reason for that is because online transaction is very fast
and reflects virtually all industries in the world.
In any case, it is also
important to understand that irrespective of the vast nature of the areas for
applicability, the overall nature of the research cannot be considered void
because it still meets the objectives of understanding consumers’ decision
making process in online transactions. Additionally, it should be noted that
irrespective of the vast nature of industries that undertake online sales, the
actual process of online transaction is similar. The process basically involved
consumers ordering what they want online and making payment for such orders
with their credit or debit cards. Other payment platforms such as Paypal and
online payment engines can also be used for the same purpose. Thus, it can be
expected hat the decision making process will be similar as a result of
measured similarities with the actual process involved. Thus, findings form
this paper are still considered highly vital for decision makers in
organizations because it will help to them in understanding the factors that
influence consumers’ decision making process and ensuring effective delivery.
1.5. Organization
of research
Figure 1.1: organization of
research
The figure above provides a
clear illustration of how the whole research process is organized. The research
starts with the introduction, which provides clear and defined approaches that
will be adopted in the research process as well as defining the purpose and
objectives of the research.
The second chapter provides
review of related literatures as the bases of defining variables that will be
tested in the primary research. The third chapter defines approaches to be
adopted in the primary research. The fourth chapter is an analysis of the
findings from the primary research as well as discussion on how the primary
research meets set research objectives. The final section is the conclusion,
which presents a summarized view of the overall research and findings from the
research process.
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Chapter
introduction
As already noted in the organization
of study from the chapter one, this section is designed to conduct a review of
related researches in the area of factors that influences consumers’ acceptance
and adoption of online transaction. Thus, this chapter will seek to meet such
purpose by defining theories related to the research topic and developing
variables that will be used for the primary research.
2.2. Framework for
review
Figure 2.1: framework for literature review
From the above framework, it
can be seen that the review of literature will be aligned with the defined
objectives and stated research questions. This is because the whole process
will be based on understanding the benefits of online transactions to
consumers, the factors that influence consumers’ adoption of online
transaction, and the issues expected to come from such process as well as
solutions for these expected issues.
2.3. Impact of
online transaction on consumers
A number of benefits emerge
from the adoption of online transaction and consumers are expected to take
advantage as well as enjoy these benefits. Chan
(2001) made known that convenience is one of such benefits. Compared
with the offline platform, consumers enjoy a vast level of convenience when it
comes to online transaction as it can be conducted any place and point in time
so long as the consumer has access to the online facility. Thus, unlike the
conventional process where sending money to friends during the weekend is not
possible, online transaction via e-Banking ensures that consumers can send money
to anybody at any point they so desires to do such. Johnson
et al. (1995) also concurs with the idea of convenience as one of the
benefits that consumers can gain from making use of online transactions, thus
validating the claims made in respect to that benefit. Still on the side of
convenience as a benefit from online transaction, it has been found by Devlin (1995) that consumers now demand improved
convenience and accessibility from brands. Thus, adopting online transaction
will increase consumers’ overall experience with a specific brand as it
increases their level of convenience. It could also be argued as the main
reason why companies offer online transactions to consumers but such argument
will be validated later on in this research. Such understanding is also
reflected in the banking sector where loner hours are spent in queue by
consumers as they seek to perform specific transactions with online transaction
reducing such long hours significantly.
Another benefit found by Baldock (1997)
with respect to online banking is that it removes the issues of time, place,
and firm constraints. For instance, a farmer in African can order fertilizer
from a Chinese firm via www.Alibaba.com and effectively increase
the production of farms where the ordered fertilizers are used. The main reason
why such is possible is because in the online setting, transactions can
actually be conducted from anywhere and at anytime as long as the consumer has
access to computer and internet connection for such purpose (Chan, 2001; Johnson et al., 1995; Jeon and Rice, 1997;
Baldock, 1997).
Birch and
Young (1997) also conducted research in the view of
understanding benefits of online transactions to consumers and made the
assertion that consumers will be able to enjoy the privilege of access and
comparison with other brands in a way that is not obtainable from offline
transaction. For instance, consumers will be able to compare prices and product
qualities through classified and auction websites such as Ebay and Amazon, thus
having the right and vast information to make decisions with respect to what
brand and at what price to purchase. Thus, searching and negotiating on deals
have been made more effective with online banking (Bakos,
1991; Malone et al., 1989, Peters, 1998). Necessary information on
pricing and returns are also gathered easily with respect to online transaction
(Birch and Young, 1997).
Chan (2001) also made the
identification that consumers will be able to save cost from travelling to the
branch and other intangible factors in the area of avoiding aggravation of
traffic jams and long queues that are some of the disadvantages of conventional
transaction process. In terms of time saving, the researcher hinted at
auto-fill as reducing time even more by automatically filling forms based on
information provided by consumers in the past. Birch
and Young (1997) continued with such benefits by stating that consumers
will be able to conduct their transaction at much ease as they will not be
subjected to high-pressure and sales person influence that are commonly noticed
in conventional transaction process.
Clearly, the above discussions have made known
that a number of benefits emerge from the adoption of online transaction. Such
benefits are reflected o increased convenience, effective transaction process,
speedy delivery, unique output process, easier access and comparison between
brands, and cost saving measures. Thus, it can be concluded based on the above discussions
that online transactions have numerous benefits to consumers.
2.4. Background
of Internet Banking
In the course of the past three decades, there have
been a witnessed increase in the proliferation of new information and
communication technologies in the financial industry, and this has had a great
impact on the way that bank’s now run businesses with their customers. With
particular references is the self-service technologies that have now enabled
banks to cut down on employment expenses as customers are being forced to do
certain things themselves; but the most important influence it has had will
come in the form of how it has helped banks to pursue electronically mediated
multi-channel strategy (N.J. Black et al., 2002).
From the view point of the customers, these new technologies provide a form of
new access to data, analysis and decision-making tool that is currently seen as
one of the financial management approaches helping customers across the world (Hoehle and Huff, 2009; Lee, 2009; Luo et al., 2010).
The 1970s witnessed the first service technology in
the finance (Railton, 1985) section with the
emergence of automated teller machines (ATMs) (Dabholkar,
1996) in the banking industry, and this machine allows customers to
withdraw or deposit money without going to the bank teller, allowing for a 24/7
banking services. This was followed by the emergence of telephone banking
services in the 1980s (Ahmad and Buttle, 2002), the
following by emergence of internet, which allows banks to further extend their
existing channels into a web-based form of distribution channel by offering
banking applications online (Bhattacherjee 2001a,b; Suh
and Han, 2002; Tan and Thompson, 2000). In the course of the past
decade, the emergence and high adoption of mobile technologies such as mobile
phones, PDAs, and smart phones have also served as a form of strong
encouragement for bank to provide mobile banking application (Barnes and Corbitt, 2003; Laukkanen and
Lauronen, 2005; Scornavacca et al., 2006) that now further extends the self-service features
down to home based services allowing customers to transact their bank related
activities directly from their homes without having to log into an internet.
In any case, the rates of adoption for these
technologies have laid down suggestions that banks are even missing the
opportunities of moving even more customers to adopt electronic banking
channels (DB research, 2009). Research have also
showed that while 73% of European banking customers make use of the ATM per
month, only 30% of the same customers actually adopt the internet banking
services (DB research, 2009; Deutsche Bank research,
2010, 2011). From a similar research, it was also found that most North
American and Australian retail banks offer telephone banking and mobile
services, but only 5-10% of the customers make use of these services (Forrester Research, 2009).
The idea of moving clients to the e-channels is very
important because of the banking that the banking industry now regard it as a
process of reducing operational costs (DB research,
2009; Deutsche Bank research, 2010, 2011)). As an example, it was shown
that E*TRADE’s implementation of telephone banking has been the main reason for
an estimated cost saving of US$ 30 million per annum (Deutsche
Bank research, 2010). Additionally, the implementation of e-banking
channels help financial institutions for the purpose of selling their financial
products and banks have been known to actively recommended and advertise
financial instruments such as investment products, savings products or credit
products through these e-banking channels (Deutsche
Bank research, 2011).
The benefits of electronic banking channels on the
view of the customers is that it serves as a form of decision support system
because it allows individuals to make real-time financial decisions in a
convenient, independent, time saving and efficient way ((Barnes and Corbitt, 2003; Laukkanen and
Lauronen, 2005; Scornavacca et al., 2006). Still on the side of the benefits to the consumers,
it allows them to make the decision of which of the banking services are good
for them and which of them to adopt ((Barnes and
Corbitt, 2003).
2.5. Electronic
banking channels and influence of its adoption in Malaysia
Basically, the main focus of this research is to
understand the key factors contributing to customers’ adoption of internet
banking in Kuala Lumpur, and researches have shown that there are four main
electronic banking channels, with these channels then having some associated
transactions and decision assisting tools. These channels include ATMs,
touch-dial telephone banking, internet banking and mobile banking. On the bases
of understanding shared in this study, adoption is used to refer the initial
use of internet banking ((Scornavacca et al., 2006),
while the sue behaviour is used to make reference to the repeated usage of
electronic banking technologies ((Barnes and Corbitt,
2003). On that ground, brief definitions of these electronic channels
are presented below.
2.5.1. ATM
banking -
is used to make reference to computerized telecommunication devices which
allows the customers of financial institutions the opportunity of directly
making use of a secured medium to access cash as well as their bank accounts (Bhattacherjee 2001a,b).
2.5.2. Telephone
banking services - is a form of computer-based keypad response or voice recognition
technologies that offers customers the opportunity of performing banking
activities through the telephone (Tan and Thompson,
2000). However, there is the need to understand that the telephone
voice-to-voice conversation between a consumers and a bank staff is considered
to be face-to-face branch banking, not telephone banking.
2.5.3. Internet
banking –
on its own is considered to be a banking channel that provides consumers with
the opportunity of performing a wide range of financial and non-financial
services though the bank’s website Suh and Han, 2002;
Tan and Thompson, 2000).
2.5.4. Mobile
banking –
is defined as the channel through which consumers interact with the bank via a
non-voice application such as text or WAP bases banking services by making use
of mobile devices like a mobile phone or personal digital assistant (PDA) (Tan and Thompson, 2000).
From the Malaysian view point, Bank Negara Malaysia (2011) presented an understanding of what
electronic banking is all about, the features that comprises of such banking
system in the country and the benefit to economic development. In the 2011
report, it was made known that internet banking is very important for
maintaining greater economic efficiency (Bank Negara,
2011). The payment system available in any country is very critical
component of the economic and financial infrastructure of the country, and this
is because it has a very important role to play in facilitating how money is
circulated in the economy, which enhances how trade, commerce and other
economic activities are conducted (Bank Negara, 2011).
The presence of a system that aids an efficient way of moving funds is as such
regarded to be highly important for financial development and the growth of
that particular economy.
The adoption of internet banking, which is capable of
offering a more expedient, secure, and cost-effective means of conducting
financial transaction has been regarded as one of the strategic tool for
achieving a greater economic efficiency, productivity and growth with
consideration of the fact that Malaysia is transitioning towards a higher
value-added, high income economy (Bank Negara, 2011).
The benefits as also noted by Bank Negara (2011)
is that it allows the businesses and society at large to enjoy a greater level
of convenience and higher efficiency in terms of their operation from the
expedient payment and the receipt of funds directly online without having to
pass through the offline queuing up. This operation plays a contributory role
towards the improvement of the level of competitiveness of the economy and an
increase in the quality of lives of the citizens (Bank
Negara, 2011). In the same report, it was also made known that the
benefits derived from migrating to e-payment are not only limited to financial
efficiency gains but also has a huge impact on building an eco-friendly
environment.
In recent decades, the efforts of bank which are
supported by an increase in technology development and innovation have been the
power point driving the transformation of e-payments towards offering a better
products and services. Banks have been the major drivers towards the adoption
of e-payments and they have well-coordinated efforts in Malaysia that are
geared towards achieving these agenda (Bank Negara,
2011). The government have also come up with supports by providing the
needed infrastructures and subsidizing information and communication
technologies in order to offer easier room for the penetration of internet
banking in the country.
Figure 2.1: E-payment transaction per capita in
Malaysia (2000-2020 projected)
Source as adapted from: Bank
Negara Malaysia (2011)
From the above figure, it can be seen that there have
been a high level of the penetration of internet banking as a measure of per
capita payment in Malaysia and this penetration is expected to continue its
high surge towards meeting the 2020 goals of transforming Malaysia into an
advanced economy. The importance of such figure can be reflected in the
understanding laid down by Bank Negara Malaysia (2011)
in which it was stated that the adoption of internet banking is very beneficial
for both the banks and society by reducing the expenses for banks and
increasing financial security for the society.
Figure 2.2: E-Payment transaction per capita in 2010
(Malaysia-vs-The World)
Source as adapted from: Bank
Negara Malaysia (2011)
Considering the fact that the adoption of internet
banking in Malaysia has been shown to be on the rise based on the above figure
2.1, it becomes important to understand how the country is performing with
respect to other countries in the world. The indication above shows that
Malaysia is not really performing well when compared to the rest of the world
as it can be seen that it is only better than Thailand from the above figure
2.2. In comparison with Finland, Australia, UK and New Zealand, the country is quite
far from the average performance, but it’s in close line with Italy, which is
an indication that it can be compared with rest of the western worlds. In any
case, the projection seen in figure 2.1 clearly shows that the country will
soon be in par with the top performers as it is projected to continue growing
in coming years.
Bank Negara Malaysia (2011) supports the above claims
by noting that there have been an encouraging growth in e-payment in the
country and the growth has been notable in all the e-payment methods. The
adoption of e-payment by customers was noted to have doubled from 22 in 2005 to
44 in 2010, and this have been supported by an increased growth in the use of
debit cards that also increased by 8.2 times, interbank GIRO by 4.5 times and
internet banking by 6.3 times (Bank Negara Malaysia,
2011).
Stating the aim of Malaysian banks, it was made known
that the major aim in the next 10 years is to increase the volume of e-payment
transaction per capital from its current position at 44 to 200 by 2020 as part
of the 2020 goal of transforming Malaysia into an advanced economy, and this
will put the country in par with most of the developed nations (Bank Negara Malaysia, 2011). This is part of the
vision of making e-payment the most preferred payment medium for economic
transactions in the country. It was also made known that this vision will be
achieved by creating a vibrant and conducive environment that will provide the
right platform for increased usage and adoption of e-payment for products and
services (Bank Negara Malaysia, 2011). This will
call in the need for new and bold measures, and the commitment by all
stakeholders to transform the Malaysian payment system into an efficient system
that is capable of delivery speed, security, convenience and reduced costs (Bank Negara Malaysia, 2011).
The impact of internet banking and e-payment platform
on Malaysian consumers in Kuala Lumpur and the country at large has been very
significant and the impact comes in the form of increased financial security,
increase transaction convenience, increased on-time and speed delivery,
reduction in banking expenses as lesser staffs are needed when compared with
the conventional transaction method, and reduced negative influence on the
environment as lesser natural resources are used in the transaction process.
The figure 2.3 is a case of how it has reduced the level of cheques in the
country and it can be seen that the reduction is very significant.
Figure 2.3: Number of cheques issued in Malaysia
Source as adapted from: Bank Negara Malaysia (2011)
From the above figure 2.3, it can be seen that the
issuance of cheques have dramatically reduced since the integration of
e-banking and e-payment options in the Malaysian economy, and this reduction is
expected to continue even higher till 2020, which is also a reflection of the
county’s 2020 development goals. So what are the benefits? They are a lot of
benefits in form of reduce expenses on the side of the bank as they don’t need
more staffs to handle the cheques, they won’t incur higher expenses to produce
the cheques and the cases of lost, fraudulent or bounced cheques are also
eliminated. On the side of the consumers, it has increased financial security
and speedy as well as convenience delivery.
2.6. Theories surrounding
adoption of new technologies
A number of competing theoretical approaches have been
adopted for the purpose of investigating the factors that determine the level
of acceptance for new information technologies (Venkatesh
et al., 2003). In this line of study, the main focus has been on the
individual acceptance of new technologies, which is done by testing their
behavioural intention (their intention towards the adoption of new
technologies) or behaviour on its own (the actual adoption of new technology)
as the depending variable from which the desires are created (Davis, 1989; Taylor and Todd, 1995). The theoretical
models are based on the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975) and on the Theory of Planned
Behaviour (TPB) (Ajzen, 1985). Thus, it is
important that that these theories be discussed and that is the main purpose of
this section.
2.6.1. Theory
of Reasoned Action (TRA)
The Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) was developed by Fishbein and Ajzen (1975), and it has been described
as one of the most influential theories in terms of theories that can e used to
explain how human behave (Venkatesh et al., 2003).
Basically, the notion of understanding presented by the theory is that the
behavioural intention of people can be linked to their attitude towards the
behaviour and the subjective norms that govern such behaviours. The attitude
that people exercise towards behaviour is described as the individual’s
positive or negative feeling that they show about performing the target behaviour
(Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975, p. 216). On the other
hand, subjective norms refer to the perception that most of the people who are
really important to the individual think of the individual’s action as to where
it should have been or should not have been performed – which is a direct
question of the behaviour (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975,
p.302).
2.6.2.
Technology acceptance model (TAM)
The technology acceptance model (TAM) is a model
proposed by Davis (9189) which is used for the purpose of predicting the
acceptance and use of new information and communication technologies within a
given organization. This model was derived from the TRA and its final version
is more of a parsimonious concept. The behavioural intention in this model can
be explained by the attitude of people towards the use of the system in terms
of its perceived usefulness. The attitude towards the use of the given system
can in turn be explained by both its perceived usefulness and how easy it is to
be used.
2.6.3. Theory
of Planned Behaviour (TPB)
The Theory or Planned Behaviour (TPB) was developed by
Ajzen (1985) as a proposed extension of the TRA
to cover situations in which the people in discussion don’t have complete
control of their behaviour. On a basic understanding, TPB is an added
determinant to the behavioural intention and people’s attitude towards the
behaviour constructs, which is the perceived behavioural control. The construct
is used to reflect on how people view things with respect to internal and
external limitations of their behaviour. On a very formal term, it is used as a
reflection of how people perceive that a given behaviour will be easy or
difficult to perform (Ajzen, 1985).
In TPB, behaviour on its own is viewed as a function
of both the perceived behavioural control and the behavioural intention. From a
different angle, the behavioural intention is influenced by the attitude of
people towards behaviour, the subjective norm and the perceived behavioural
control; the determinants of the intention on the same hand are built by the
underlying structures of the beliefs.
From the above discussions, a definitive understanding
can be gained from the discussion as to the fact that that the willingness of
an individual to adopt e-banking services is heavily influenced by the
perceived benefit and how people will judge such behaviour. This implies that
when people view e-baking to be a right action, more people will be likely to
adopt it as it will change into a social norm following adoption by different
people in the society. On the same hand, it was gained through the review that
while it can easily be converted into a social norm, some people will adopt
internet banking unconsciously – as not being geared by their own perception or
desires, but highly influenced their unconsciousness in the environment they
live in.
2.7. Key
factors for adoption of internet banking: Malaysian consumers’ perception
Davis (1989) make the finding that the overall attitude of an
individual towards adoption of any given information technology (IT) and its
applications is pivotal towards determining whether or not the individual will
be willing to make use of the system. On the same ground, the attitude of an
individual towards the use of that particular technology is highly influences
by the perceived ease-of-use of that particular IT application. Abrazhevich (2001) added support to the above theory
in another study where it was made known that a user’s perception of e-payment
has a significant role to play in the users’ willingness to accept such system,
which will also be highly depending on the user’s attitude. Another statement
made by Eastin (2002) offers a further
supporting by stating that the initial adoption of IT will have an identifiable
impact as a result of the fact that consumers will normally adopt new services
only when they have experienced a similar service in the past. The basic
understanding is that attitude plays the most influential role on consumers’
adoption of internet banking and e-payment option, but the attitude of these
consumers are influenced by a number of factors and these factors are as
discussed below.
2.7.1. Perceived
benefits
Benefit was identified by Chou
et al. (2004) as a significant driver of consumers’ acceptance and
adoption of e-payment options. On a similar study, it was made known by Eastin (2002) who conducted a study on four e-commerce
activities (online shopping, banking, investing, and e-payment systems) that
before ay adoption, the perceived convenience and financial benefits predicts
the decision of consumers to adopt the service. Gerrard
and Cunningham (2003) also view perceived economic benefit as being
comprised of fixed and transaction costs that is associated with the adoption
of e-payment option in which the fixed cost are used to refer to the cost of
installing the payment equipment like the card readers and payment software;
while the transaction cost are those cost incurred by customers and merchants
every time they carry out a given business transaction (Chou et al., 2004). Basically, the gained understanding is that
consumers are more likely to adopt e-payment options if they view it as having
higher benefits than the conventional method (Gerrard and
Cunninghamm, 2003; San-Martin et al, 2012; San-Martin et al, 2013).
Wendy et al. (2013) made known that the
statistics of e-payment adoption in Malaysia clearly shows that the perception
of the system by Malaysians is slowly changing from making use of cash to e-pay
as a result of a number of reasons. For instance, the high rate of convenience
offered by credit card is a reflection of how attractive it is as a payment
option and the Malaysian consumers perceive the convenience it has to offer, as
well as the potential for business growth based on instantaneous transaction
and these features are the main reason behind its increased adoption in the
Malaysian setting.
2.7.2.
Perceived usefulness
Davis (1989) defined perceive usefulness as the degree at which
an individual believes that making use of a given system will help improve his
or her job performance (p.320). By hypotheses, it was made known that intention
to adopt internet banking feature will depend heavily on how individuals can
link it to increase in their overall performance. This is the degree at which
it will allow them to serve customers on-point, on-time and without causing any
hindrance on the potential of the individual to take advantage of any
opportunity arising at any given point in time.
2.7.3.
Perceived trust
Trust has been defined as a measure of the degree of
risk that is involved in a given financial transaction, and the outcome of
trust is a reduction in the perceived risk, which will lead to positive
intention of the consumers’ towards the adoption of e-payment (Yousafzai et al., 2003). Even before then, it has also
been found by studies that trust is a significant determinant that influences
consumers’ willingness to conduct e-commerce transaction and engage in online
exchange and transfer of money (Friedman et al., 2000;
Gefen, 2000; 2003; Hoffman et al., 1999; Jarvenpaa et al., 2000; Wang et al.,
2003). Trust is also a catalyst for buyer-seller transaction as it
offers the buyer a high expectation of satisfying exchange relationship (Peha and Khamitov, 2004). On that ground, it is
believed by numerous researches that trust is important for understanding the
interpersonal behaviour and economic exchange effects of consumers’ perception
towards e-payment systems (Abrazhevich, 2001; Chou et
al., 2004; Tsiakis and Sthephanides, 2005) and subsequently its adoption
success (Chau and Poon, 2003; Kniberg, 2002; Liao and
Wong, 2004; Lim et al., 2006). On that ground, it can be stated that
trust plays significant role with respect to the willingness of Kuala Lumpur
consumers’ to adopt e-payment options.
2.7.4. Level
of Self-efficacy
Bandura (1986) noted that self-efficacy on its own is derived by
the level of experience of an individual’s mastery. The beliefs of
self-efficacy are developed as response to four sources of information. These
information are success or failure of previous experience; vicarious experience
gathered from observing other people’s success or failure; verbal persuasion
from peers, colleagues and relatives; and affective state of an individual’s
emotional arousal such as anxiety.
In support of the above argument, a number of studies
have found that self-efficacy has a significant positive influence on the
perception and behavioural intention of an individual to adopt information
systems (IS) (Hill et al., 1986, 1987; Luarn and Lin,
2005). This is based on the understanding that users with high
self-efficacy sill on that same ground, it has been found by studies that users
with high level of self-efficacy seem to experienced more media and
communication tools, while those with lower level of self-efficacy seem to be
confined to fewer options (Burton-Jones and Hubona,
2006; Li et al., 2011). As such, it can be stated that a higher level of
self-efficacy will influence and individual’s chances of adopting e-payment
option because they will have a higher level of confidence within them and will
be more willing to try new technologies.
2.7.5. Ease of
use
There are numerous studies with the view that a
technology will more likely be used if it is perceived as being easier to use (Legris et al., 2003; Venkatesh and Davis, 2000; Wang and Li,
2011). Flavian and Guinaliu (2006) also pointed out that the ease of use
of any computing system has a negative influence on the trust. This is based on
the understanding that consumers will be more likely to take full control of
issues that will arise from the usage if the system is easier to use.
Additionally, the greater reveal of usability of a system will favour minor
searching costs (Bakos, 1997) and this is the
understanding that Guriting and Ndubisi (2006)
based their research to discover that when Malaysian users view as system as
being easy to use, it will have a significant positive influence on their
behavioural intentions to adopt online banking services and hence e-payment in
the Malaysian market.
2.7.6.
Perceived level of security
On a general ground, security is seen as the set of procedures and
program used by a system for the purpose of verifying the information and
sources in order to guarantee the privacy and integrity of the information (Tsiakis and Sthephanides, 2005). The level of security
offered is definitely on the high note with respect to Malaysian consumers’
adoption of internet banking and e-payment features as they are very conscious
of their hard earned revenues. On that ground, the higher the level of security
offered by the e-banking feature, the higher the potential of customers to
adopt it (Tsiakis and Sthephanides, 2005).
2.8. Research Model
5 elements proposed in this
research: - Online Retailer Trustworthy (Independent), Risk Concern
(Independent), Privacy concern (Independent), Internet Security Concern
(Independent), and Adoption on online transaction (Dependant).
Figure 2.4: research model
Source refers to research
model and amended from Critical Success Factors for Adoption of e-Banking
in Malaysia. (MMU University)
2.9 Research Hypothesis
Based on the above
framework, the hypothesis for this research are as stated below and they serve
as the foundation for the primary research.
H1: Relationship among
adoption on online transaction is related to Internet Security Concern.
H2: Relationship among
adoption on online transaction is related to Risk Concern.
H3: Relationship among
adoption on online transaction is related to Privacy Concern.
H4: Relationship among
adoption on online transaction is related to online retailer Trustworthy.
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1. Chapter introduction
There is a common
understanding and generally conceived term that falling to plan is planning to
fail. Thus, in any given research, there is need to have a clear plan of what
is to be done and how it will be done. This is the main purpose that methodology
does play in primary research. This, this section of the research is designed
to present a clear outline of how the whole primary research process was
conducted.
3.2. Questionnaire design
A total of 20 questions were
loaded into the questionnaire with each of the independent variable attributed
to 5 questions. The questionnaire design was based on a 5-point likert’s rating
scale in which responders where to choose between 1 (totally disagreeing) to 5
(totally agreeing) with any given question and 3 is the neutral answer which is
the point where a respondent neither agree nor disagree with the statement. The
questionnaire comprised of two major sections. The first section is the
bio-data section in which information relating to respondents demographics where
gathered and the gathered demographics include: age, gender, income,
employment, education, bank used, and years of experience with a banking
service. The second section is the questionnaire section in which respondents
addressed the 20 questions loaded in the questionnaire. The basic criterion for
participating in this research is that respondent must be making used of a
banking service. A total of 200 responses where gathered and analyzed.
3.3. Data collection
Considering that the purpose
of the research is to understand factors that influence consumers’ adoption of
e-banking in Malaysia where Malaysia as a whole represents the target group. Thus,
it was deemed important to ensure that all Malaysians meeting set criterion for
participation are provided with equal opportunity to participate in the
research. However, this is extremely difficult because of the large landmass of
the country. As such, online survey was chosen as the right survey platform
because it will provide the needed equality for participating in the research.
Additionally, online survey was also chosen because of the research topic which
clearly reflects a consumers’ ability to make use of internet and other
electronic devices. The survey was hosted on www.freesurveyonline.com and advertised through Google and Facebook. The
advanced advertisement network of both Facebook and Google meant that users can
easily be targeted based on countries, and Malaysian users where targeted bed
on that means.
3.4. Measurement
In order to ensure that the
variables loaded into this research are easily measurable, the following
components made up intern banking framework as: access to account, control of
the account and account usage based on adoption from Qureshi
et al. (2008) and all elements where measured with 5-points likert’s
rating scape as noted agree. Consumers’ adoption was measured based on four
items as: awareness, interest, evaluation and usages based on the adoption from
Michael (2007), while consumers’ satisfaction
level with e-banking services was measured on level of commitment, loyalty,
retention and recommendation of such services (Ndubisi
and Sinti, 2006; Raman et al., 2008).
3.5. Validity
Validity is defined by Hair et al. (2007: 8) as the extent to which a measure
can accurately be used as a representation of what is meant to do, and this
make validity a very important concern in defined research measure. As noted by
Fujun et al. (2007), there are three kinds of
validity: content validity, construct validity, and predictive validity.
Content validity was defined by Duggirala et al. (2008)
as the assessment of how individual items corresponds with concepts. Content
validity was adopted in this research through the review of literatures that
shade light on factors affecting adoption of internet banking, and gained
understanding from this literature was used in loading primary variable.
Additionally, predictive validity was also used as shown in chapter 4, and the
predictive validity used in this case is cronbach’s alpha.
3.6. Reliability
Reliability is an indication
of how a variable or sets of variables is in line with what it is meant to
measure (Hair et al., 2007). It is different
from validity because it is not related with what is being measured but instead
is related to how such item is being measured. This research adopted different
items in its numerous constructs, which means that internal consistency was
applied as the right approach for this study. As noted by Hair et al. (2007), the rational for internal
consistency is that individual items should be measured with the same construct
that was used in the study and this is applicable in this research. Fujun et al. (2007) made known that the Cronbach
analysis with a value of 0.70 clearly demonstrated internal consistency of data
the value in this research can be considered consistent because the obtainable
value is in line with such figure.
3.7. Limitations of data gathering method
A number of researches have
been done in the area of understanding factors limiting online survey (for example, Fricker and Schonlau, 2002; Furrer and Sudharshan, 2001;
Ilieva et al., 2002; Malhotra, 2004; McDaniel and Gates, 2005; Tingling et al.,
2003; Wilson and Laskey, 2003),
and findings from these research point out to a number of issues which are also
considered limitations to this research as:
3.7.1.
Skewed attributes of the internet population – a number of studies have been conducted in the area of
understanding how the internet actually represents the real world (for example, Fricker and Schonlau, 2002; Grossnickle and Raskin, 2001;
Miller, 2001; Ray and Tabor, 2003; Wilson and Laskey, 2003) with finding from such studies being
that that internet cannot be used as a representation of the real world. This
is because, internet is still limited to only those that can afford to have it,
have the chance to use it, and are making use of it when surveys are being
conducted online. However, Fricker
and Schonlau (2002) presented an argument against such idea
stating that the internet can be viewed as a representation of the real
population because these issues can also occur in conventional researches. For
instance, offline researches are also limited to respondents available at the
time of the research.
3.7.2. Respondents lack of online
expertise – research
findings indicate that the internet is made up of users who have not used the
internet for a couple of months (Greenspan, 2003), which limits their overall expertise with internet features. This
issue was limited by designing an easy to access webpage for respondents to
participate easily.
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
4.1.
Introduction
In this chapter, he main purpose if to
present an analysis of the findings from the primary research. The analysis
will be based on both demographic and questionnaire variable loaded with
descriptive, frequency, regression, ANOVA, t-Test and other statistical
analysis presented in the view of proving stated hypotheses.
4.2.
Reliability test
Table 4.1: Case Processing Summary
|
|||
N
|
%
|
||
Cases
|
Valid
|
200
|
100.0
|
Excludeda
|
0
|
.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
|
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
|
Table 4.2: Reliability Statistics
|
|
Cronbach's Alpha
|
N of Items
|
.750
|
29
|
Earlier in the chapter 3, the views of Fujun et al. (2007) as the guiding principle
of reliability testing was presented and it was made known in this chapter that
for a data to be considered reliable, it must have a value set of at least
0.70. As can be seen above, the crombach alpha value of the data used in this
research has a value bigger than 0.70, which makes it highly reliable.
4.3.
Demographic variables
4.3.1.
Race of respondents
Table 4.3: What is your race?
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
malay
|
73
|
36.5
|
36.5
|
36.5
|
chinese
|
47
|
23.5
|
23.5
|
60.0
|
|
indian
|
37
|
18.5
|
18.5
|
78.5
|
|
other local race
|
28
|
14.0
|
14.0
|
92.5
|
|
foriegner
|
15
|
7.5
|
7.5
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Understanding the race of respondent is very
important because it can be used as a measure of the most affected race as well
as studying the influence of culture on respondents’ choices. The above
analysis shows that Malays are the most populous race in terms of volume of
response with 36.5% of the total response, followed by Chinese with 23.5%,
Indians at 18.5%, other Malaysian races at 14% and the least being foreigners
with just 7.5%. In essence, this finding is very significant because it clearly
represents all races in Malaysia (at least to the minute level), making the
overall research process more valid because the findings can be applied to all
races in Malaysia.
4.3.2.
Gender of respondents
Table 4.4: What is your gender
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
male
|
123
|
61.5
|
61.5
|
61.5
|
female
|
77
|
38.5
|
38.5
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Majority of the respondents are men with 61.5% of
the total population, while women represents 38.5% of the total population.
There is a clear gap in terms of gender, but all genders are well represents,
which implies that findings from the research can be applied to both genders.
4.3.3
Age of respondents
Table 4.5: How old are you?
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
18-20 yers
|
15
|
7.5
|
7.5
|
7.5
|
21-30 years
|
74
|
37.0
|
37.0
|
44.5
|
|
31-40 years
|
90
|
45.0
|
45.0
|
89.5
|
|
41-50 years
|
12
|
6.0
|
6.0
|
95.5
|
|
51-60 years
|
9
|
4.5
|
4.5
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Age is a very important variable in this research
because it can determine consumers’ level of experience with the banking system
and adoption of e-banking services. The findings indicates that majority of the
respondents are aged 31-40 years (45%) followed by those aged 21-20 years
(37%), 18-20 years (7.5%), 41-50 years (6%), and 51-60 years (4.5%). While
there are disparities in terms of the age group representation, the most
significant indication here is that all age groups are well represented. Thus,
it can be said that findings from this research can be applied to all age
groups.
4.3.4.
Educational level of respondents
Table 4.5: What is your educational level
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
not educated
|
3
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
high school
|
33
|
16.5
|
16.5
|
18.0
|
|
diploma
|
50
|
25.0
|
25.0
|
43.0
|
|
degree
|
68
|
34.0
|
34.0
|
77.0
|
|
masters
|
27
|
13.5
|
13.5
|
90.5
|
|
PhD
|
19
|
9.5
|
9.5
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Educational level is very significant because it
can be used as a measure of respondents’ cognitive abilities. Only 1.5% of the
respondents are not educated, which means that majority of the respondents have
gained needed cognitive competence for addressing the questions that are set in
this research. Such an understanding further validates the overall quality of
gathered data.
4.3.5:
Respondents’ years of experience with banking service
Table 4.6: How many years have you been using
banking services?
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
1-3 years
|
44
|
22.0
|
22.0
|
22.0
|
4-6 years
|
103
|
51.5
|
51.5
|
73.5
|
|
7-10 years
|
37
|
18.5
|
18.5
|
92.0
|
|
above 10 years
|
16
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
The effect of years of experience in this case is
the fact that the longer a customers must have been using a banking service,
the better the customers is positioned to rate such service. 51% of the
respondents have been making use of the banking service for 4-6 years, followed
by 22% at 1-3 years, 18% for 7-10 years and 8% for more than 10 years.
Considering that 78% of the total respondents have been making use of banking
services for more than 3 years, it can be stated that their years of experience
further improves the quality of this research because they are well positioned
to address the research.
4.3.6
Familiarity and usage of e-banking services
Table 4.7: Are you familiar with any e-banking
services offered by your bank?
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
yes
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table 4.8: Have you made use of /are you
currently making use any e-banking service?
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
yes
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
The above tables 4.7 and 4.8 showcases a perfect
response in the sense that all respondents agree to be familiar with at least
one of the e-banking services offered by their banks and also make use of at
least one of such services. This is positive for findings to be generated from
this research because it implies that respondents will be answering based on
actual experience.
4.3.7
E-banking services used and years of usage
Table 4.9: If yes, what is the e-banking service
you are making use of?
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
atm
|
89
|
44.5
|
44.5
|
44.5
|
internet banking
|
7
|
3.5
|
3.5
|
48.0
|
|
pos
|
17
|
8.5
|
8.5
|
56.5
|
|
phone banking
|
11
|
5.5
|
5.5
|
62.0
|
|
none of the above
|
76
|
38.0
|
38.0
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table 4.10: How many years have you been making
use of e-banking services
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
1-3 years
|
72
|
36.0
|
36.0
|
36.0
|
4-6 years
|
90
|
45.0
|
45.0
|
81.0
|
|
7-10 years
|
27
|
13.5
|
13.5
|
94.5
|
|
above 10 years
|
11
|
5.5
|
5.5
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Respondents
make use of different e-banking services and they have been making use of such
for years as the tables 4.9 and 4.10 shows respectively. Thus, all demographic
variables loaded in this research have returned positive influence on the
quality of research because the data has been affected positively from
respondents’ level of experience and usage of e-banking services across
different banks and sectors in Malaysia.
4.4.
Descriptive statistics of variables
Table 4.11:Descriptive Statistics
|
|||||||
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Kurtosis
|
||
Statistic
|
Statistic
|
Statistic
|
Statistic
|
Statistic
|
Statistic
|
Std. Error
|
|
I think e-banking is secured
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0900
|
.96257
|
2.121
|
.342
|
I think e-banking is convenient
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.2400
|
.99365
|
2.664
|
.342
|
I think e-banking is effective and efficient
|
200
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.4950
|
.68727
|
3.648
|
.342
|
I think e-banking is easy to use
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
3.9800
|
1.19446
|
.640
|
.342
|
I think e-banking has lower risk
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0900
|
1.04275
|
1.206
|
.342
|
I make use of e-banking because I feel secured with my banks’
facilities
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
3.9750
|
1.28945
|
.440
|
.342
|
I make use of internet banking because I fell
lower risk with my bank’s services
|
200
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.2600
|
1.01368
|
.147
|
.342
|
I make use of internet banking because it offer
me higher privacy
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.1700
|
.98282
|
2.749
|
.342
|
I make use of internet banking because it’s
convenient
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.3100
|
1.01442
|
4.228
|
.342
|
I make use of e-banking because I trust my banks
facilities
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.2000
|
1.21961
|
1.220
|
.342
|
I make use of internet banking because I find it
easy to use
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.2900
|
1.07315
|
2.053
|
.342
|
I think security should be improved in e-banking
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0350
|
.96354
|
2.308
|
.342
|
I think privacy should be improved in e-banking
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.2100
|
1.13239
|
2.804
|
.342
|
I think risk should be reduced in e-banking
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0650
|
1.26442
|
.297
|
.342
|
I will make use of e-banking services more if it
offers higher security measure
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.2200
|
1.08512
|
1.821
|
.342
|
I will make use of e-banking more if it offers
higher privacy
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0950
|
1.03990
|
2.097
|
.342
|
I will make use of e-banking more if it offers
lower risk
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.3100
|
.93179
|
4.029
|
.342
|
I will make use of e-banking more if it is made
easier to use
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.1800
|
1.22273
|
1.084
|
.342
|
I think e-banking is the future of banking
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.2100
|
1.13682
|
1.249
|
.342
|
I think e-banking will replace conventional
banking entirely in the nearest future.
|
200
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0300
|
1.11143
|
1.695
|
.342
|
Valid N (listwise)
|
200
|
4.5
Correlation to independent variables
Table 4.12: Correlations of independent variables
|
||||||
I think e-banking is secured
|
I think e-banking is convenient
|
I think e-banking is effective and efficient
|
I think e-banking is easy to use
|
I think e-banking has lower risk
|
||
I think e-banking is secured
|
Pearson Correlation
|
1
|
.713**
|
.654**
|
.736**
|
.843**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking is convenient
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.713**
|
1
|
.863**
|
.694**
|
.857**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking is effective and efficient
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.654**
|
.863**
|
1
|
.679**
|
.835**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking is easy to use
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.736**
|
.694**
|
.679**
|
1
|
.873**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking has lower risk
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.843**
|
.857**
|
.835**
|
.873**
|
1
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level
(1-tailed).
|
4.6.
Correlation of between dependent variables and demographics variables
Table 4.13: Correlations between independent
variables and demographics
|
|||||||||||
I think e-banking is secured
|
I think e-banking is convenient
|
I think e-banking is effective and efficient
|
I think e-banking is easy to use
|
I think e-banking has lower risk
|
What is your race?
|
What is your gender
|
How old are you?
|
What is your educational level
|
How many years have you been using banking
services?
|
||
I think e-banking is secured
|
Pearson Correlation
|
1
|
.713**
|
.654**
|
.736**
|
.843**
|
.571**
|
-.524**
|
.638**
|
-.789**
|
.697**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking is convenient
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.713**
|
1
|
.863**
|
.694**
|
.857**
|
.601**
|
-.700**
|
.538**
|
-.726**
|
.569**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking is effective and efficient
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.654**
|
.863**
|
1
|
.679**
|
.835**
|
.680**
|
-.796**
|
.619**
|
-.754**
|
.620**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking is easy to use
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.736**
|
.694**
|
.679**
|
1
|
.873**
|
.700**
|
-.703**
|
.523**
|
-.831**
|
.760**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking has lower risk
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.843**
|
.857**
|
.835**
|
.873**
|
1
|
.731**
|
-.720**
|
.589**
|
-.906**
|
.758**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
What is your race?
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.571**
|
.601**
|
.680**
|
.700**
|
.731**
|
1
|
-.777**
|
.645**
|
-.839**
|
.760**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
What is your gender
|
Pearson Correlation
|
-.524**
|
-.700**
|
-.796**
|
-.703**
|
-.720**
|
-.777**
|
1
|
-.625**
|
.747**
|
-.654**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
How old are you?
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.638**
|
.538**
|
.619**
|
.523**
|
.589**
|
.645**
|
-.625**
|
1
|
-.695**
|
.495**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
What is your educational level
|
Pearson Correlation
|
-.789**
|
-.726**
|
-.754**
|
-.831**
|
-.906**
|
-.839**
|
.747**
|
-.695**
|
1
|
-.830**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
How many years have you been using banking
services?
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.697**
|
.569**
|
.620**
|
.760**
|
.758**
|
.760**
|
-.654**
|
.495**
|
-.830**
|
1
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level
(1-tailed).
|
From the above analysis, three main
demographics variables where found to influence the dependent variables and
they are: Race, Age, and Years of experience with banking services. The
understanding here is that the race of respondents influence their perception
of security, privacy, convenience and risk issues with e-banking services in
Malaysia; and the older a respondent is or the longer a respondent has been
making use of e-banking services in Malaysia, the higher the respondents
evaluation of the process, attribution of positivity and negativity to the
variables and greater the chances of these variables influences their adoption
rate.
4.7.
Correlation between independent variable and dependent variables
Table 4.14: Correlations between independent
variable and dependent variables
|
||||||||||
I think e-banking is secured
|
I think e-banking is convenient
|
I think e-banking is effective and efficient
|
I think e-banking is easy to use
|
I think e-banking has lower risk
|
I will make use of e-banking services more if it
offers higher security measure
|
I will make use of e-banking more if it offers
higher privacy
|
I will make use of e-banking more if it offers
lower risk
|
I will make use of e-banking more if it is made
easier to use
|
||
I think e-banking is secured
|
Pearson Correlation
|
1
|
.713**
|
.654**
|
.736**
|
.843**
|
-.399**
|
-.415**
|
.518**
|
-.462**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking is convenient
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.713**
|
1
|
.863**
|
.694**
|
.857**
|
-.198**
|
-.251**
|
.576**
|
-.334**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.002
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking is effective and efficient
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.654**
|
.863**
|
1
|
.679**
|
.835**
|
-.234**
|
-.432**
|
.308**
|
-.471**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking is easy to use
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.736**
|
.694**
|
.679**
|
1
|
.873**
|
-.237**
|
-.318**
|
.164*
|
-.493**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.010
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I think e-banking has lower risk
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.843**
|
.857**
|
.835**
|
.873**
|
1
|
-.249**
|
-.416**
|
.385**
|
-.494**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I will make use of e-banking services more if it
offers higher security measure
|
Pearson Correlation
|
-.399**
|
-.198**
|
-.234**
|
-.237**
|
-.249**
|
1
|
-.068
|
-.013
|
.682**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.002
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.171
|
.427
|
.000
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I will make use of e-banking more if it offers
higher privacy
|
Pearson Correlation
|
-.415**
|
-.251**
|
-.432**
|
-.318**
|
-.416**
|
-.068
|
1
|
-.046
|
.160*
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.171
|
.258
|
.012
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I will make use of e-banking more if it offers
lower risk
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.518**
|
.576**
|
.308**
|
.164*
|
.385**
|
-.013
|
-.046
|
1
|
.207**
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.010
|
.000
|
.427
|
.258
|
.002
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
I will make use of e-banking more if it is made
easier to use
|
Pearson Correlation
|
-.462**
|
-.334**
|
-.471**
|
-.493**
|
-.494**
|
.682**
|
.160*
|
.207**
|
1
|
Sig. (1-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.000
|
.012
|
.002
|
||
N
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level
(1-tailed).
|
||||||||||
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level
(1-tailed).
|
From
all the loaded variables, risk is the most correlated. It correlates with every
other variable and this is a significant discovery because it is a clear
implication that consumers are more worried about the risk of using e-banking
services as compared with other issues. It is understanding because earlier
notes from the literature review made known that the increase in information
and communication technologies has increased risks emerging form the adoption
of e-banking services.
4.8. ANOVA and Coefficient
Table 4.15: ANOVAa
|
||||||
Model
|
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
|
1
|
Regression
|
123.089
|
6
|
20.515
|
229.308
|
.000b
|
Residual
|
17.266
|
193
|
.089
|
|||
Total
|
140.355
|
199
|
||||
a. Dependent Variable: How many years have you
been making use of e-banking services
|
||||||
b. Predictors: (Constant), I make use of internet
banking because I find it easy to use, I make use of internet banking because
it’s convenient , I make use of internet banking because it offer me higher
privacy , I make use of e-banking
because I feel secured with my banks’ facilities, I make use of
internet banking because I fell lower risk with my bank’s services, I make
use of e-banking because I trust my banks facilities
|
The test of ANOVA was conducted in order to
determine the extent of respondents’ age of experience with making use of
e-banking influences their perception of variables loaded. With the obtained F
value and Sig. value, it is clear that the longer a respondent make use of
e-banking services, the higher the respondents rating of such banking system,
thus validating earlier claims that age of experience determine perception of
e-banking and adoption. In summary, it can be said that if a consumer has
experienced positive outcomes from e-banking, their chances of loyalty,
re-adoption and recommendation is increased significantly.
Table 4.16: Coefficientsa
|
||||||
Model
|
Unstandardized Coefficients
|
Standardized Coefficients
|
t
|
Sig.
|
||
B
|
Std. Error
|
Beta
|
||||
1
|
(Constant)
|
4.767
|
.234
|
20.411
|
.000
|
|
I make use of e-banking because
I feel secured with my banks’ facilities
|
.183
|
.026
|
.280
|
7.027
|
.000
|
|
I make use of internet banking because I fell lower risk with my
bank’s services
|
.093
|
.041
|
.113
|
2.275
|
.024
|
|
I make use of internet banking because it offer me higher privacy
|
-.236
|
.028
|
-.277
|
-8.414
|
.000
|
|
I make use of internet banking because it’s convenient
|
-.088
|
.026
|
-.106
|
-3.349
|
.001
|
|
I make use of e-banking because I trust my banks facilities
|
-.201
|
.035
|
-.292
|
-5.716
|
.000
|
|
I make use of internet banking because I find it easy to use
|
-.419
|
.039
|
-.535
|
-10.871
|
.000
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: How many years have you been making use of
e-banking services
|
Just like the ANOVA test, this coefficient
of variables analyzed above shows that years of experience with e-banking
services has a significant influence eon consumer’s perception of associated
risks and security issues with no effect on how consumers’ perceive
convenience, trust and ease of use of –banking services. It is clear as to why
such is noticed because security and risks are better understood with
advancement in age as the respondents must have been engaged in numerous
activities that shaped how they see risk and security. However, factors such as
convenience and ease of use is not influenced by age because every customers
wants the e-banking features to be easy to use as well as convenient.
4.9.
Proof of hypotheses
HP1: Security of e-banking services
influences consumers’ decision to adopt e-banking.
Table 4.17: I make use of e-banking because I feel secured with my banks’
facilities
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
1.00
|
20
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
2.00
|
12
|
6.0
|
6.0
|
16.0
|
|
3.00
|
12
|
6.0
|
6.0
|
22.0
|
|
4.00
|
65
|
32.5
|
32.5
|
54.5
|
|
5.00
|
91
|
45.5
|
45.5
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
The above analysis shows that customers
general concur with such understanding because 78% of the total respondent
agree to that. Thus, the first hypotheses has been proven to be true in the
sense that is e-banking facilities are viewed to be secured, customers will
make use of it and if they are view to be less secured, customers will likely
not adopt e-banking services in Malaysia.
HP2: Risk of e-banking services influences
consumers’ decision to adopt e-banking.
4.18: I make use of internet banking because I
fell lower risk with my bank’s services
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
2.00
|
22
|
11.0
|
11.0
|
11.0
|
3.00
|
17
|
8.5
|
8.5
|
19.5
|
|
4.00
|
48
|
24.0
|
24.0
|
43.5
|
|
5.00
|
113
|
56.5
|
56.5
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
The second hypothese made known that the
more risk e-banking services are, the less intention to adopt from customers
and vice versa. 80.5% of the total respondents agree to that, further
validating such hypotheses.
HP3: Privacy of e-banking services
influences consumers’ decision to adopt e-banking.
Table 4.19: I make use of internet banking
because it offer me higher privacy
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
1.00
|
8
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
2.00
|
8
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
8.0
|
|
3.00
|
10
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
13.0
|
|
4.00
|
90
|
45.0
|
45.0
|
58.0
|
|
5.00
|
84
|
42.0
|
42.0
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Just like the two hypotheses discussed
earlier, 87% of respondents agree that the privacy provided by e-banking
service features will influence their overall adoption of such features. This
influences comes in the form of the higher the provided privacy, the higher the
level of adoption.
HP4: built trust on e-banking services
influences consumers’ decision to adopt e-banking.
Table 4.20: I make use of e-banking because I
trust my banks facilities
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
1.00
|
14
|
7.0
|
7.0
|
7.0
|
2.00
|
12
|
6.0
|
6.0
|
13.0
|
|
3.00
|
12
|
6.0
|
6.0
|
19.0
|
|
4.00
|
44
|
22.0
|
22.0
|
41.0
|
|
5.00
|
118
|
59.0
|
59.0
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
200
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
4.10.
Summary of findings
With success on understanding factors that
influence consumers’ adoption of e-banking services already measured, it can be
further highlighted that in the Malaysian setting, such factors include
customers’ perceived trust, security features, risk, privacy, convenience, and
ease of use with the e-banking service features.
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1.
Summary
Right from the onset of this research, a
clear purpose was communicated from the research title and the purpose is to
understand factors that influence consumers’ adoption of e-banking services in
Malaysia. The task to achieve this purpose was set off with an introduction,
which defined what is to be done and how it will be done. A background review
showed that e-banking is the new way to bank because it is faster, efficient,
effective and convenient. Both bankers and consumers benefits from the
advantages of e-banking. However, shifting from what consumers are used to
(conventional banking method) to a new approach (e-banking) will not be easy
because of the huge difference in terms of operation, process and application.
In order to effectively transit from conventional to e-banking, consumers
needed to have necessary skills to operate the electronic devices used in this
new banking platform as well as have these devices at their disposal. Thus, the
decision to understand factors that influence consumers’ adoption rate was
deemed necessary because it will help both researchers (in setting new
theories) and managers (in designing better functional management systems).
Following success with chapter one, the
second chapter is a literature review and it was designed to gain an
understanding on what existing literatures have in common about the research
topic. As such, a number of theories were revisited and addressed, further
opening eyes as to the fact that adoption of e-banking is present on its
highest in Malaysian since the invention of such banking platform. This
findings is beneficial to the research because it implies that majority of the
users do make use of e-banking services and are in the right position to
address questions that will be asked in the research questionnaire.
Chapter three also presented clear methods
for conducting the research, which the measurability, validity, and reliability
of data discussed. The most significant note from this section is the fact that
research was online based and this allowed respondents from all over Malaysia
to participate in the research. Thus, gathered data represented the Malaysian
population more significantly than offline research would have done.
With success recorded in the
first three chapter, the fourth chapter proceeded to analyze findings from the
primary research and the most significant of such is that the factors
influencing adoption of e-banking services in Malaysia include: security
concerns on internet – as consumers are worries that the internet doesn’t offer
them much security as conventional banking method, which means that the more a
view views the internet as being secured for e-banking services, the higher the
users’ chances to adopt e-banking services; in line with the internet security,
users think that e-baking services have higher risk exposure and the higher
their perception of e-banking services in such view, the lower their chances
and desire to adopt e-banking service; still in line with security and risk,
users are worried about the privacy of their banking services which means that
the higher a customer views e-banking service as offering needed privacy, the
higher the consumers’ decision to adopt such banking service; and the final
measured variable is trust with finding indicating that the more consumers
trust bank and their e-banking services, the more the consumer will likely adopt
such e-banking services.
In essence, it is a thing of
joy to see that the main purpose of this research has been achieved, but it
should be noted that the process was not as easy as the findings discussed
above. This is because a number of factors hindered the research process and
made it difficult for the research to analyze data easily. First of such is the
fact that the research found it very difficult to adopt some of the data
analysis in SPSS due to lack of familiarity with such analysis, however, the
research took out necessary time to understand the analytical process and
ensured that all data were analyzed as necessary. Secondary, the large volume
of data and information analyze in the course of this research also wore out
the researcher’s mental and psychological strength but necessary measures were
taken to ensure that such isn’t an issue when it comes to quality of the
overall findings.
5.2 Recommendations
In the wake of the findings
made from this research, it is recommended that managements should align their
e-banking services with increased consumers’ privacy, reduced risk, increased
security measures and higher trust. This is because findings indicate that such
measures will go a long way in ensuring customer loyalty and overall success of
e-banking services in Malaysia.
5.3. Forward for future research
The focus of this research
has been on understanding factors that influence customers’ adoption of
e-banking services, but such understanding has neglected the need to understand
how these factors can be enhanced or mitigated to achieve certain goals. Thus,
it is recommended that future research in line within this research should be
designed to understand how the identified factors can be enhanced or mitigated
in order to support application of findings gathered here.
6. References
A. Bhattacherjee, An empirical
analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance,
Decision Support Systems 32 (2001a) 201–214.
A. Bhattacherjee, Understanding
information systems continuance: an expectation– confirmation model, MIS
Quarterly 25 (3) (2001b) 351–370.
Abrazhevich, D. (2001),
“Electronic payment systems: Issues of user acceptance”, in B. Stanford-Smith
and E. Chiozza (Eds.), E-Work and E-Commerce, pp. 354-360, IOS Press.
Ajzen, I. (1985), “From
intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior”, in Kuhl, J. And Beckmann,
J. (Eds), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Springer, Heilderberg,
pp. 11-39.
B. Suh, I. Han, Effect of trust
on customer acceptance of Internet banking, Electronic Commerce Research and
Applications 1 (3–4) (2002) 247–263.
Bakos, J.Y. (1997), “Reducing
buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces”, Management
Science, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 1676–1692.
Bandura, A. (1986), Social
foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Prentice-Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Bank Negara Malasyia (2011),
“financial sector blueprint 2011–2020: stron g s t a b l e s u s t a i n a b l
e future”. Page 138-152.
Burton-Jones, A. and Hubona, G.S.
(2006), “The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance
model”, Information and Management, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 706- 717.
Chau, P. and Poon, S. (2003),
“Octopus: An e-cash payment system success story”, Communications of the ACM,
Vol. 46 No.9, pp. 129–133.
Chou, Y., Lee, C. and Chung, J.
(2004), “Understanding M-commerce payment systems through the analytic
hierarchy process”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57 No. 12, pp.1423-1430.
Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived
usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of computer technology”,
MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.
Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived
usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information
technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.13 No. 3, pp. 319- 340.
DB Research, Banking online
boosts and curbs customer loyalty, (cited 2009 13.04.).
Deutsche Bank research, Online
banking and research: the state of play in 2010, 2010.
Deutsche Bank research, Social
media in finance: users want tangible benefits, not friendship, 2011.
Duggirala M, Rajendran C,
Anantharaman RN (2008). Provider perceived Dimensions of total quality
management in healthcare. Benchmarking. 15(6): 693-722.
E. Scornavacca, S.J. Barnes, S.L.
Huff, Mobile business research published in 2000–2004: emergence, current
status, and future opportunities, Communications of the Association for
Information Systems (AIS) 17 (2006) 635–646.
Eastin, M.J. (2002), “Diffusion
of e-commerce: an analysis of the adoption of four Ecommerce activities”,
Telematics and Informatics, Vol.19 No. 3, pp. 251-267.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I.
(1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory
and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Flavian, C. and Guinaliu, M.
(2006), “Consumer trust, perceived security and privacy policy: Three basic
elements of loyalty to a web site”, Industrial Management & Data Systems,
Vol. 106 No.5, pp. 601-620.
Forrester Research,
Technographics survey highlight: Canadian online trust and mobile banking
(Matiesanu, C.), 2009.
Fricker, R.D. Jr and Schonlau, M.
(2002), “Advantages and disadvantages of internet research surveys: evidence
from the literature”, Field Methods, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 347-67.
Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H. Jr. and
Howe, D.C. (2000), “Trust online”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43 No.12,
pp. 34-40.
Fujun L, Hutchinson J, Li D, Bai
C (2007). An empirical assessment and application of SERVQUAL in mainland
China’smobile communications industry. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., 24(3):
244-262.
Furrer, O. and Sudharshan, D.
(2001), “Internet marketing research: opportunities and problems”, Qualitative
Marketing Research, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 123-9.
Gefen, D. (2000), “E-Commerce:
The role of familiarity and trust”, Omega: The International Journal of
Management Science, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 725-737.
Gefen, D. (2003), “TAM or just
plain habit: A look at experienced online shoppers”, Journal of Organizational
and End User Computing, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 1-13.
Gerrard, P., and Cunningham, J.B.
(2003), “The diffusion of Internet banking among Singapore consumers”,
International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp.16-28.
Greenspan, R. (2003), “Tracking
the experienced users,” August 27, available at:
www.clickz.com/stats/big_picture/geographics/article.php/3069511
Grossnickle, J. and Raskin, O.
(2001), “What’s ahead on the internet”, Marketing Research, No. Summer, pp.
9-13.
Guriting, P. and Ndubisi, N.O.
(2006), “Borneo online banking: evaluating customer perceptions and behavioural
intention”, Management Research News, Vol. 29 No. 1/2, pp. 6 -15.
H. Hoehle, S. Huff, Electronic
banking channels and task-channel fit, International Conference on Information
Systems, Proceedings published by the University of Minnesota, Phoenix,
Arizona, USA, 2009.
Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson
R, Tatham R (2007). Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson
Education, Inc. Jaruwachirathanakul B, Fink D (2005). Internet banking
adoption.
Hill, T., Smith, N.D. and Mann,
M.F. (1986), “Communicating innovations: Convincing computer phobics to adopt
innovative technologies”, in R.J. Lutz (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research,
Association of Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp.419-422.
Hill, T., Smith, N.D. and Mann,
M.F. (1987), “Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use
advanced technologies: The case of computers”, Journal of Applied Psychology,
Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 307-313.
Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P. and
Peralta, M. (1999), “Building consumer trust online”, Communications of the
ACM, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 80–85.
Ilieva, J., Baron, S. and Healey,
N.M. (2002), “Online surveys in marketing research: pros and cons”,
International Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 361-76.
J. Railton, Automated teller
machines, Computer Law & Security 1 (4) (1985).
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, J.
and Vitale, M. (2000), “Consumer trust in an internet store”, Information
Technology and Management, Vol. 1 No.1&2, pp. 45-71.
Kniberg, H. (2002), “What makes a
micropayment solution succeed?”, Master’s thesis, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan,
Stockholm.
Legris, P., Ingham, J. and
Collerette, P. (2003), “Why do people use information technology? A critical
review of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, Vol.
40 No.3, pp. 191-204.
Li, M., Dong, Z.Y. and Chen, X.
(2011), “Factors influencing consumption experience of mobile commerce”,
Internet Research, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 120-141.
Lim, B., Lee, H. and Kurnia, S.
(2006), “Why did an electronic payment system fail? A case study from the
system provider’s perspective”, available at:
http://www.collecter2006.unisa.edu.au/Paper%2011%20Benjamin%20Lim.pdf (accessed
14 December 2009).
Luarn, P. and Lin, H.H. (2005),
“Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use Mbanking”,
Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 873–891.
M. Tan, S.H.T. Thompson, Factors
influencing the adoption of Internet banking, Journal of the Association for
Information Systems 1 (July) (2000) 1–43.
M.-C. Lee, Factors influencing
the adoption of internet banking: an integration of TAM and TPB with perceived
risk and perceived benefit, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research and
Applications 8 (3) (2009) 130–141.
Malhotra, N.K. (2004), Marketing
Research: An Applied Orientation, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
McDaniel, C. and Gates, R.
(2005), Marketing Research, 6th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Michael N (2007). Customer
loyalty: How to create advocacy. Retrieved on 01 July, 2010 from World Wide
Web: http://www.ababj.com/management/customer-loyalty-how-to-createadvocates-feb.-07.html
Miller, T.W. (2001), “Can we
trust the data of online research?”, Marketing Research, Vol. 13, Summer, pp.
26-32.
N.J. Black, et al., Modelling
consumer choice of distribution channels: an illustration from financial
services, International Journal of Bank Marketing 20 (4) (2002) 161–173.
Ndubisi NO, Sinti Q (2006).
Consumer attitudes, system's characteristics and internet banking adoption in
Malaysia. Retrieved on [January, 2009] from World Wide Web:
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do?contentId=1541450&contentType=Article
P.A. Dabholkar, Consumer
evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: an investigation of
alternative models of service quality, International Journal of Research in
Marketing 13 (1) (1996) 29–51.
Qureshi TM, Zafar MK, Khan MB
(2008). Customer Acceptance of Online Banking in Developing Economies.
Retrieved on [January, 2010] from World Wide Web:
http://www.arraydev.com/commerce/jibc/2008-04/Tahir%20Masood.pdf.
R. Ahmad, F. Buttle, Retaining
telephone banking customers at Frontier Bank, International Journal of Bank
Marketing 20 (1) (2002) 5–16.
Raman SR, Alam N, Mphil MK
(2008). Information Technology in Malaysia: E-service quality and Uptake of
Internet banking. Retrieved on [January, 2010] from World Wide Web:
http://www.arraydev.com/commerce/JIBC/2008-08/JIBCArticle_MuraliRaman.pdf.
Ray, N.M. and Tabor, S.W. (2003),
“Cyber surveys come of age”, Marketing Research, Spring, pp. 32-7.
S.J. Barnes, B. Corbitt, Mobile
banking: concept and potential, International Journal of Mobile Communications
1 (3) (2003) 273–288.
San-Martin, S. and López-Catalán,
B. (2013), “How can a mobile vendor get satisfied customers?” Industrial
Management & Data Systems, Vol. 113, N0. 2, pp. 156 – 170 Sathye.
Sonia San-Martín, S.,
López-Catalán, B., and Ramón-Jerónimo, M. A. (2012) "Factors determining
firms' perceived performance of mobile commerce", Industrial Management
& Data Systems, Vol. 112 No. 6, pp.946 – 963.
T. Laukkanen, J. Lauronen,
Consumer value creation in mobile banking services, International Journal of
Mobile Communications 3 (4) (2005) 325–338.
Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995),
“Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models”,
Information Systems Research, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 144-76.
Tingling, P., Parent, M. and
Wade, M. (2003), “Extending the capabilities of internet-based research:
lessons from the field”, Internet Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 223-35.
Tsiakis, T. and Sthephanides, G.
(2005), “The concept of security and trust in electronic payments”, Computers
and Security, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 10-15.
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D.
(2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four
longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186- 204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G.,
Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology:
toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 425-78.
Wang, W.T. and Li, H.M. (2011),
“Factors influencing mobile services adoption: A brand-equity perspective”,
Internet Research, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 142-179.
Wang, Y.S., Wang, Y.M., Lin, H.H.
and Tang, T.I. (2003), “Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: An
empirical study”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 14
No. 5, pp. 501-519.
Wilson, A. and Laskey, N. (2003),
“Internet-based marketing research: a serious alternative to traditional
research methods?”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp.
79-84.
X. Luo, et al., Examining multi-dimensional
trust and multi-faceted risk in initial acceptance of emerging technologies: an
empirical study of mobile banking services, Decision Support Systems 49 (2010)
222–234.
Yousafzai, S.Y., Pallister, J.G.
and Foxall, G.R. (2003), “A proposed model of e-trust for electronic banking”,
Technovation, Vol. 23 No. 2003, pp.847-860.